Bank of Hays v. Perez
Plaintiff: Bank of Hays
Defendant: Jorge Perez
Case Number: 6:2022cv01127
Filed: May 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: John W Broomes
Referring Judge: Rachel E Schwartz
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Regarding #5 Plaintiff's Response to the Show-Cause Order. The Magistrate Judge previously ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the complaint did not establish complete diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff's response to the show-cause order and newly filed amended complaint now adequately allege the citizenship of the Defendant. As such, Plaintiff has pleaded facts sufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction, and, therefore, the Magistrate Judge will not recommend dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 6/15/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(bh)
June 15, 2022 Filing 5 RESPONSE re #3 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Bank of Hays. (Zluticky, Nicholas)
June 15, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jorge Perez, filed by Bank of Hays. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Note, #2 Exhibit B - Mortgage, #3 Exhibit C - Security Agreement)(Zluticky, Nicholas)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing to the Magistrate Judge on or before June 22, 2022, why the Magistrate Judge should not recommend that the District Judge dismiss this case without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz on 6/7/2022. (bh)
June 3, 2022 ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jorge Perez (issued to Attorney for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk)
June 1, 2022 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk)
June 1, 2022 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jorge Perez (issued to Attorney for service). (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk)
May 31, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Bank of Hays. (Zluticky, Nicholas)
May 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5791391.), filed by Bank of Hays. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Note, #2 Exhibit B - Mortgage, #3 Exhibit C - Security Agreement)(Zluticky, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bank of Hays v. Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bank of Hays
Represented By: Nicholas J. Zluticky
Represented By: Lauren Fleming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jorge Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?