Baker v. Braum's, Inc. et al
| Kathy Baker |
| Braums, Inc., Retail Buildings, Inc. and Braum's, Inc. |
| 6:2022cv01227 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| John W Broomes |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer: SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 12/2/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ala) |
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Discovery. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Interrogatories and Requests for Production is extended up to and including December 19, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 12/2/2022. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kf)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for extension of time for Defendants to Answer Discovery by Defendants Braum's, Inc., Retail Buildings, Inc. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Wetta, Rachel) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE by Defendants Braum's, Inc., Retail Buildings, Inc. of Rule 26 Disclosures. (Wetta, Rachel) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Braum's, Inc., Retail Buildings, Inc. of Defendants' Discovery Requests to Plaintiff. (Wetta, Rachel) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Kathy Baker of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures. (Young, Melinda) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Kathy Baker of Plaintiff's Roggs & RFPD to Def Retail Buildings. (Young, Melinda) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF SERVICE by Kathy Baker of Plaintiff's Roggs & RFPD to Def Braum's. (Young, Melinda) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 12/2/2022 at 11:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures and Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 10/7/22. (ala)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Braum's, Inc., Retail Buildings, Inc. (Wetta, Rachel) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal with the State Court by Braum's, Inc., Retail Buildings, Inc. (Wetta, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Braum's, Inc., Retail Buildings, Inc. identifying None as corporate parent. (Wetta, Rachel) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendants Braum's, Inc., Retail Buildings, Inc. - trial to be held in Wichita. (Wetta, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendants Braum's, Inc., Retail Buildings, Inc. (Wetta, Rachel) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/5/2022.) (jsh) |
| Filing 2 STATE COURT RECORDS from District Court of Reno County, KS, 2022-CV-000221. (Wetta, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Reno County, KS, case number 2022-CV-000221, trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5883101.), filed by Retail Buildings, Inc., Braum's, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1) (Wetta, Rachel) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
