Neill v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Melissa Neill
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Case Number: 6:2022cv01238
Filed: October 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Holly L Teeter
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2022 Filing 9 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - Certified copy of transcript of record by Defendant Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. (Pruett, Richard)
December 14, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Social Security Administration, Commissioner of.(Pruett, Richard)
November 28, 2022 Filing 7 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Richard W. Pruett on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Pruett, Richard)
November 7, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Melissa Neill upon Office Regional Counsel (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served ORC 10/24/22)(Young, Kelsey)
November 7, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Melissa Neill upon (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served: Atty General 10/26/22)(Young, Kelsey)
November 7, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Returned Executed -- served by Certified Mail on 10/25/2022 Social Security Administration, Commissioner of served on 10/25/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. Summons served on United States Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served US Atty 10/25/22)(Young, Kelsey)
October 20, 2022 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (issued to Attorney for service). (kmc)
October 20, 2022 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kmc)
October 19, 2022 Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Melissa Neill - trial to be held in Wichita. (Young, Kelsey)
October 19, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Melissa Neill. (Young, Kelsey)
October 19, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5894652.), filed by Melissa Neill. (Young, Kelsey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neill v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Neill
Represented By: Kelsey Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Represented By: Richard W. Pruett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Regional Administrator
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?