Senogles v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Jesse Daniel Senogles
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 6:2023cv01038
Filed: March 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Eric F Melgren
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2023 Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - Certified copy of transcript of record by Defendant Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. Initial Brief due by 6/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 001 Certification Page, #2 002 Court Transcript Index, #3 003 Administrative documents and oral hearing transcript (Pages 1 - 63), #4 004 Payment documents and decisions (Pages 64 - 99), #5 005 Jurisdictional documents and notices (Pages 100 - 218), #6 006 Non disability related development (Pages 219 - 239), #7 007 Disability related development (Pages 240 - 358), #8 008 Medical Records (Pages 359 - 616), #9 009 Medical Records (Pages 617 - 805), #10 010 Medical Records (Pages 806 - 928))(Warner, Marc)
March 20, 2023 Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Marc Thayne Warner on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Warner, Marc)
March 14, 2023 Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Jesse Daniel Senogles - trial to be held in Wichita. (Young, Kelsey)
March 14, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Jesse Daniel Senogles. (Young, Kelsey)
March 14, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - SOCIAL SECURITY with trial location of Wichita. (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6010834.) Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Fed. R. Civ. P. Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, the Notice of Electronic Filing for this Complaint has been transmitted to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas, as well as the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, filed by Jesse Daniel Senogles. (Young, Kelsey)
March 14, 2023 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) Social Security Administrative Record due 5/15/2023. (jsh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Senogles v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Daniel Senogles
Represented By: Kelsey Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Represented By: Marc Thayne Warner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?