Wong v. Tamayo et al
| Candace Wong |
| Alejandro Salas Tamayo, Pahoran Alejandro Garcia-Bustamante, Randy Lynn Ogata, Larry K. Smith, Tri-Rotor Crop Services, LLC, Tri-Rotor AG Services, Inc., Tri-Rotor Spray & Chemical, Inc., Tri-Rotor, LLC and Bell Textron, Inc. |
| 6:2023cv01098 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| Angel D Mitchell |
| Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 9/12/2023 at 11:00 AM in Telephone ADM - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749; ACCESS CODE 3977627 before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 8/22/2023. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 9/1/2023. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 9/1/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 7/18/2023. (ht)
|
| Filing 22 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tri-Rotor Spray & Chemical, Inc. identifying J & L Smith Farms, Inc. as corporate parent . (Vasseur-Browne, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendants Pahoran Alejandro Garcia-Bustamante, Randy Lynn Ogata, Alejandro Salas Tamayo, Tri-Rotor AG Services, Inc., Tri-Rotor, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Vasseur-Browne, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 20 ANSWER to #19 Amended Complaint by Larry K. Smith, Tri-Rotor Spray & Chemical, Inc..(Vasseur-Browne, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 19 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Pahoran Alejandro Garcia-Bustamante, Randy Lynn Ogata, Larry K. Smith, Alejandro Salas Tamayo, Tri-Rotor AG Services, Inc., Tri-Rotor Spray & Chemical, Inc., Tri-Rotor, LLC, filed by Candace Wong. (Cross, Gerald) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - Tri-Rotor Crop Services, LLC by Candace Wong. (Cross, Gerald) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - Bell Textron Inc. by Candace Wong. (Cross, Gerald) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Michael R. Grieco for Candace Wong pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 6/28/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for attorney Michael R. Grieco to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6094824.) by Plaintiff Candace Wong. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Cross, Gerald) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to File Her First Amended Complaint on or by June 30, 2023. The motion is granted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Plaintiff must file her Amended Complaint by June 30, 2023. In accord with the previous schedule set by the court in ECF 12, defendants' responses to the Amended Complaint are due within 10 days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 6/26/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
| Filing 13 UNOPPOSED MOTION to File First Amended Complaint on or by June 30, 2023 by Plaintiff Candace Wong. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Cross, Gerald) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings. The motion states that plaintiff intends to file an amended complaint. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), plaintiff may file an amended complaint as a matter of course up until June 23, 2023. If plaintiff files an amended complaint by that date, movants' responsive pleadings to the amended complaint are due within 10 days thereafter. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by that date, movants' responsive pleadings to the original complaint are due by July 6, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 6/14/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (amh)
|
| Filing 11 SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Their Responsive Pleadings by Defendants Pahoran Alejandro Garcia-Bustamante, Randy Lynn Ogata, Larry K. Smith, Alejandro Salas Tamayo, Tri-Rotor AG Services, Inc., Tri-Rotor Crop Services, LLC, Tri-Rotor Spray & Chemical, Inc., Tri-Rotor, LLC. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Vasseur-Browne, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings. Defendants Alejandro Salas Tamayo, Pahoran Alejandro Garcia-Bustamante, Randy Lynn Ogata, Larry K. Smith, Tri-Rotor Crop Services, LLC, Tri-Rotor Ag Services, Inc., Tri-Rotor Spray & Chemical, Inc. and Tri-Rotor, LLC have until June 19, 2023, to file their answers or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 6/6/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
| Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Their Responsive Pleadings by Defendants Pahoran Alejandro Garcia-Bustamante, Randy Lynn Ogata, Larry K. Smith, Alejandro Salas Tamayo, Tri-Rotor AG Services, Inc., Tri-Rotor Crop Services, LLC, Tri-Rotor Spray & Chemical, Inc., Tri-Rotor, LLC. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Vasseur-Browne, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant Bell Textron, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Preheim, Lynn) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Defendant Bell Textron Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Its Responsive Pleading. Defendant Bell Textron Inc. has until June 2, 2023, to file its answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 5/25/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ht)
|
| Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Bell Textron, Inc. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell.) (Preheim, Lynn) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE by Defendant Bell Textron, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Preheim, Lynn) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bell Textron, Inc. identifying Textron Inc. as corporate parent. (Preheim, Lynn) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Bell Textron, Inc. - trial to be held in Wichita. (Preheim, Lynn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Bell Textron, Inc. (Preheim, Lynn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Grant County District Court, case number GT-2023-CV-000012, trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6066538.), filed by Bell Textron, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Exhibit B - NTSB Final Report, #3 Exhibit C - NTSB 4-8-98 Report)(Preheim, Lynn) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
