421, LLC v. Yingling Aircraft, Inc
421, LLC |
Yingling Aircraft, Inc doing business as Yingling Aviation and Yingling Aircraft, Inc. doing business as Yingling Aviation |
Yingling Aircraft, Inc. |
6:2023cv01114 |
June 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
Eric F Melgren |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Yingling Aircraft, Inc. identifying Nicman Holdings, Inc. as corporate parent . (Spahn, Jeff) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #8 Answer to Counterclaim by 421, LLC.(Wohlford, Will) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David L. Edwards for 421, LLC pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 7/24/23. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ala) |
Filing 11 MOTION for attorney David L. Edwards to appear pro hac vice (Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6110066.) by Plaintiff 421, LLC. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer.) (Attachments: #1 Ex. A-Affidavit and ECF Reg. Form)(Wohlford, Will) |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to #9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff 421, LLC. (Wohlford, Will) |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by 421, LLC identifying none as corporate parent. (Wohlford, Will) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint AND COUNTERCLAIM against 421, LLC by Yingling Aircraft, Inc. (Spahn, Jeff) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by 421, LLC upon Yingling Aircraft, Inc. served on 6/12/2023, answer due 7/17/2023. (Wohlford, Will) |
Filing 6 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 07/17/2023 for Defendant Yingling Aircraft, Inc. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 06/15/2023. (nao) |
Filing 5 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Jeff C. Spahn, Jr. on behalf of All Defendants. (Spahn, Jeff) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Yingling Aircraft, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (nao) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Yingling Aircraft, Inc., filed by 421, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Wohlford, Will) Modified on 7/19/2023, wrong party selected as the defendant in the amended complaint. (mam) |
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff 421, LLC - trial to be held in Wichita. (Wohlford, Will) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff 421, LLC. (Wohlford, Will) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6075534.), filed by 421, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Wohlford, Will) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (nao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.