PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Stuber et al
| PHH Mortgage Corporation |
| Joseph Scott Stuber, Scott Stuber, Joseph S. Stuber, J. S. Stuber, J. Scott Stuber, John Doe, Jane Doe, Chisholm Creek Condominium Homeowners Association, Esther Kay Manns, Unknown Heirs, executors, Administrators, devisees, trustees, Creditors, and assigns of Any deceased defendants, the, unknown spouses of any defendants, the, Unknown executors, administrators, devisees, trustees, creditors, successors and assigns of any defendants that are or were partners or in partnership and unknown guardians, conservators and trustees of any defendants that are minors or are under any legal disability and all other person who are or may be concerned, the |
| 6:2023cv01123 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Teresa J James |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion to Deny Defendant Joseph Stuber's Motion to Dismiss as Moot, or Alternatively for Additional Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #12 ) is denied in part and granted in part. Plaintiff has until 8/29/2023, to respond to the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #5 ). Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 8/10/2023. (mam)
|
|
NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document #14 Memorandum and Order mailed to Joseph Scott Stuber on 8/10/2023 by regular mail. (mam)
|
|
Filing 13
SERVICE BY PUBLICATION filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. Last publication date 08/01/2023. (Doornink, Chad)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Order denying Defendant Joseph Stuber's Motion to Dismiss as Moot, or Alternatively for Additional Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff PHH Mortgage Corporation (Nichols, Justin)
|
|
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #12 MOTION for Order denying Defendant Joseph Stuber's Motion to Dismiss as Moot, or Alternatively for Additional Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(byk)
|
|
NOTICE Re: Pro Se Mailing. Document #11 Notice and Order to Show Cause mailed to Joseph Scott Stuber on 8/7/2023 by regular mail. (mam)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: On or before 8/25/2023, Plaintiff PHH Mortgage Corporation shall either file an amended complaint that alleges the citizenship of all parties, or file a response to this order showing good cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 8/4/2023. (byk)
|
|
Filing 10
SERVICE BY PUBLICATION filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. Last publication date 08/01/2023. (Doornink, Chad)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Joseph Stuber's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #5 ). The Response deadline is extended to August 7, 2023. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 07/18/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (mig)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff PHH Mortgage Corporation (referred to Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James) (Nichols, Justin)
|
|
MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(byk)
|
|
Filing 7
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Grant Berning on behalf of PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Berning, Grant)
|
|
Filing 6
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Justin M. Nichols on behalf of PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Nichols, Justin)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Joseph Scott Stuber. (sz)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Chisholm Creek Condominium Homeowners Association, Jane Doe, John Doe, Esther Kay Manns (to two different addresses), Joseph Scott Stuber (issued to Attorney for service). Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk)
|
|
Filing 4
DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff PHH Mortgage Corporation - trial to be held in Wichita. (Doornink, Chad)
|
|
Filing 3
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by PHH Mortgage Corporation identifying Ocwen Financial Corporation as corporate parent.(Doornink, Chad)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Doornink, Chad)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6088093.), filed by PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Note, #2 Exhibit B - Mortgage, #3 Exhibit C - Assignment of Mortgage, #4 Exhibit D - Certificate of Merger)(Doornink, Chad)
|
|
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
