Kopf Shah v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
| Amelia Kopf Shah |
| Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
| Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel |
| 6:2023cv01124 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Lungstrum |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT. Signed by deputy clerk on 8/17/2023. (kas) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Unopposed MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration. This Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) with a REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 8/17/2023. (kas)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration by Defendant Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Verdis, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - Certified copy of transcript of record by Defendant Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. Initial Brief due by 9/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 001 Certification Page, #2 002 Court Transcript Index, #3 003 Administrative documents and oral hearing transcript (Pages 1 - 92), #4 004 Payment documents and decisions (Pages 93 - 109), #5 005 Jurisdictional documents and notices (Pages 110 - 327), #6 006 Non disability related development (Pages 328 - 397), #7 007 Disability related development (Pages 398 - 533), #8 008 Medical Records (Pages 534 - 901), #9 009 Medical Records (Pages 902 - 1015), #10 010 Medical Records (Pages 1016 - 1294), #11 011 Medical Records (Pages 1295 - 1574), #12 012 Medical Records (Pages 1575 - 1860), #13 013 Medical Records (Pages 1861 - 1955), #14 014 Medical Records (Pages 1956 - 2139), #15 015 Medical Records (Pages 2140 - 2333), #16 016 Medical Records (Pages 2334 - 2369), #17 017 Medical Records (Pages 2370 - 2624), #18 018 Medical Records (Pages 2625 - 2657), #19 019 Medical Records (Pages 2658 - 2692), #20 020 Medical Records (Pages 2693 - 2731), #21 021 Medical Records (Pages 2732 - 2773), #22 022 Medical Records (Pages 2774 - 3020), #23 023 Medical Records (Pages 3021 - 3528), #24 024 Medical Records (Pages 3529 - 3647))(Verdis, Michelle) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Michelle Verdis on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Verdis, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Amelia Kopf Shah - trial to be held in Wichita. (Young, Kelsey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Amelia Kopf Shah. (Young, Kelsey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - SOCIAL SECURITY with trial location of Wichita. ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6090397.) Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Fed. R. Civ. P. Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, the Notice of Electronic Filing for this Complaint has been transmitted to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas, as well as the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, filed by Amelia Kopf Shah.(Young, Kelsey) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Lungstrum for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) Social Security Administrative Record due 8/21/2023. (nao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
