Watson v. Leclerc
| Carl E. Watson, I |
| Jessica Lee Leclerc |
| 6:2023cv01156 |
| August 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Holly L Teeter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER. The Court scheduled a Status Conference in related case 23-1109 Watson v. Veterans Evaluation Services, et al. via Zoom. Plaintiff was provided notice there in the Court's 9/20/2023 Memorandum and Order denying Motion for Accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act sent by regular mail. The Court provided Plaintiff with a link to join the conference via Zoom by email which was received as evidenced by Plaintiff's response thereto. A reminder call was placed after the start time for the conference had passed and a voice message was left for Plaintiff. Nonetheless, Plaintiff failed to appear. This is the second time Plaintiff has failed to appear in one of his four related cases. He previously failed to appear after proper notice on 6/20/2023 for a telephonic Status Conference in 22-1275 Watson v. The Department of Veterans Affairs. The Court extends Plaintiff's deadline for service of Defendants in this matter up to and including November 13, 2023. If Defendant has not obtained service on Defendants by the deadline an Order to Show Cause why the undersigned should not recommend dismissal of the case will issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 9/27/2023. Mailed to pro se party Carl E. Watson by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (kf)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying as moot (Doc. 11) Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to appeal. No dispositive action has been taken in this case, and there is no order or judgment to appeal. This case remains active, and Plaintiff remains responsible for litigating it. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 9/26/2023. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) (alh)
|
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #11 MOTION for extension of time. The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(alh) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for extension of time (titled: Motion for Fourteen-Day Extension) by Plaintiff Carl E. Watson, I. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ca) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying as moot #9 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to appeal. No dispositive action has been taken in this case, and there is no order or judgment to appeal. This case remains active, and Plaintiff remains responsible for litigating it. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 9/12/2023.Mailed to pro se party Carl Watson by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (md)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for extension of time (titled: Motion For a Ten-Day Extension) by Plaintiff Carl E. Watson, I. (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ca) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying as moot #7 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to appeal. No dispositive action has been taken in this case, and there is no order or judgment to appeal. This case remains active, and Plaintiff remains responsible for litigating it. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 9/8/2023. Mailed to pro se party Carl Watson by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (md)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by Plaintiff Carl E. Watson, (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer). (Document tiled "Motion for a Leave of Court")(sz) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's filing titled "Motion for an Extension of Time Explanation" #4 . Plaintiff appears to think that this Court's order dismissing Case No. 22-1275 also dismissed this case. It did not. This case had not been filed when 22-1275 was dismissed. No dispositive action has been taken in this case, and there is no order or judgment to appeal. This case remains active. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 8/29/2023. Mailed to pro se party Carl Watson by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (md)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: Case reassigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter for all further proceedings. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Holly L. Teeter on 8/29/2023. Mailed to pro se party Carl Watson by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(md)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for extension of time Explanation by Plaintiff Carl E. Watson, I (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (msb) |
| Filing 3 (DISREGARD THIS ENTRY AS IT WAS FILED IN THE WRONG CASE) MOTION for extension of time to present notice of appeal by Plaintiff Carl E. Watson, I (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer)(msb) Modified text on 8/9/2023 (msb). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Carl E. Watson, I. (jk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by Carl E. Watson, I. (jk) |
| FILING FEE PAID: in the amount of $402, receipt number 600002659. (jk) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. Copy of NEF mailed to pro se Plaintiff Carl E. Watson, I at 7130 W. Maple Street, Suite 230 PMB 241, Wichita, KS 67209 by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jessica Lee Leclerc (Returned to plaintiff for service). Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to Plaintiff for service with complaint. Copy of NEF mailed to pro se Plaintiff Carl E. Watson, I at 7130 W. Maple Street, Suite 230 PMB 241, Wichita, KS 67209 by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Watson v. Leclerc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carl E. Watson, I | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jessica Lee Leclerc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
