Randle v. Bank of America
Plaintiff: Joseph Randle
Defendant: Bank of America and Bank of America, N.A.
Case Number: 6:2023cv01232
Filed: October 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Eric F Melgren
Referring Judge: Julie A Robinson
2 Judge: Brooks G Severson
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2023 NOTICE OF DOCKET TEXT MODIFICATION by Deputy Clerk regarding Doc. #11 Motion for Order: Document was inadvertently filed as a motion however the document is actually the Response to #7 Motion to Dismiss. The title of the docket entry has been corrected to reflect this change. Mailed to pro se party Joseph Randle by regular mail. (kao)
December 12, 2023 MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #10 MOTION for Hearing and #11 MOTION for Order. The motions will be resolved by the District Judge. (tl)
December 11, 2023 Filing 11 RESPONSE re #7 Motion to Dismiss (titled Motion to Dismiss Statue of Limitation) by Plaintiff Joseph Randle. (jal) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/12/2023: #1 ***Duplicate received by mail***) (sz). Modified on 12/12/2023 to correct title. (kao)
December 11, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION for Hearing (titled: Motion to Schedule Conference) by Plaintiff Joseph Randle. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (jal)
November 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER. The undersigned Magistrate Judge has reviewed the pending Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 7). The Court, in its discretion, has determined that judicial economy is best served by staying discovery until after the District Judge rules on the Motion to Dismiss. If the case (or any portion thereof) survives the dispositive motion, Defense counsel is instructed to contact the Magistrate Judge's chambers within 10 days of the District Court's decision so that the undersigned may enter an initial order and set this case for a scheduling conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooks G. Severson on 11/22/2023. Mailed to pro se party Joseph Randle by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (tl)
November 21, 2023 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Bank of America. (Berhorst, Jennifer)
November 21, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Bank of America. (Berhorst, Jennifer)
November 21, 2023 Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren for all further proceedings. District Judge Julie A. Robinson no longer assigned to case. Signed by deputy clerk on 11/21/23. Mailed to pro se party Joseph Randle 7301 E. Clay Street Wichita, KS 67207 by regular mail. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(kao)
November 1, 2023 Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 11/21/2023 for Defendant Bank of America to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 11/1/2023. Mailed to pro se party Joseph Randle, 7301 E. Clay Street, Wichita, KS 67207 by regular mail. (jsh)
October 31, 2023 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bank of America identifying BAC North America Holding Company, NB Holdings Corporation and Bank of America Corporation as corporate parents. (Berhorst, Jennifer)
October 31, 2023 Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Bank of America - trial to be held in Wichita. (Berhorst, Jennifer)
October 31, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Bank of America. (Berhorst, Jennifer)
October 31, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Sedgwick County, Kansas, case number SG-2023-CV-001785, trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6190698.), filed by Bank of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Petition, #2 Exhibit B - Summons) (Berhorst, Jennifer)
October 31, 2023 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Brooks G. Severson for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jsh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Randle v. Bank of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America
Represented By: Jennifer L. Berhorst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Jennifer L. Berhorst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Randle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?