United States of America v. Firearm 1 et al
| United States of America |
| Firearm 1, Firearm 2, Firearm 3, Firearm 4, Firearm 5, Firearm 6, Firearm 7, Firearm 8, Firearm 9, Firearm 10 and Ammunition |
| 6:2024cv01004 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Rachel E Schwartz |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM AND ORDER FOR NOTICE. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 1/30/2024. (mam)
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff United States of America. (Gurney, Annette) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Gurney, Annette) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (nac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
