Thorne v. Hoffman Trucking Inc.
| Paige Thorne |
| Hoffman Trucking Inc. |
| 6:2024cv01006 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Gwynne E Birzer |
| Toby Crouse |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 4/3/2024 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures and Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/27/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 2/13/2024. (ala)
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hoffman Trucking Inc. identifying None as corporate parent. (Price, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Anne Gepford Beville on behalf of Hoffman Trucking Inc. (Beville, Anne) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Hoffman Trucking Inc. (Price, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Jennifer J. Price on behalf of Hoffman Trucking Inc. (Price, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 DIVERSITY JURISDICTION STATEMENT by Plaintiff Paige Thorne. (Rhodes, Arthur) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Paige Thorne. (Rhodes, Arthur) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita (Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6247614.), filed by Paige Thorne. (Rhodes, Arthur) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Hoffman Trucking Inc.. (issued to Attorney for service) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (msb) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (mam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thorne v. Hoffman Trucking Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paige Thorne | |
| Represented By: | Dustin L. DeVaughn |
| Represented By: | Arthur E. Rhodes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hoffman Trucking Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Anne Gepford Beville |
| Represented By: | Jennifer J. Price |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
