Leiker v. Mudd
| Katherine Leiker and Kay Leiker |
| Makayla Fae Mudd |
| 6:2024cv01222 |
| December 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| John W Broomes |
| Brooks G Severson |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Katherine Leiker. (Casey, Derek) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Wichita ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6533467.), filed by Katherine Leiker.(Casey, Derek) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Makayla Fae Mudd. (issued to Attorney for service) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (nac) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge John W. Broomes and Magistrate Judge Brooks G. Severson for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at https://www.uscourts.gov/file/459/download (nac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
