Morris v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
Dennis Morris |
Wyeth, Inc., Pliva, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Morton Grove, Schwarz Pharma, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. and UDL Laboratories Inc. |
1:2007cv00176 |
October 18, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Bowling Green Office |
Taylor |
Thomas B. Russell |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/20/2009 re 96 MOTION for Reconsideration, filed by Dennis Morris. For the reasons stated, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to establish the exceptional circumstances necessary for the Court to reconsider its 10/24/2008 Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. An appropriate order shall issue. cc: Counsel (CDF) |
Filing 93 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Thomas B. Russell on 10/24/2008 re 60 MOTION to Dismiss Based on Federal Preemption filed by Pliva, Inc., 64 Joinder in MOTION to Dismiss filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc., UDL Laboratories Inc., 85 Joinder in MOTION to Dismiss filed by Morton Grove. For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. An appropriate order shall issue. cc: Counsel (CDF) |
Filing 92 OPINION AND ORDER denying 59 Motion for Entry of Final Judgment under Rule 54(b) signed by Judge Thomas B. Russell on 10/21/2008. cc: Counsel (LMW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.