Hadden v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Vernon Hadden
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2008cv00010
Filed: January 17, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Social Security: HIA Office
County: Todd
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/6/2009; For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Department of Health and Human Services is upheld. The herein action is DISMISSED with prejudice. An appropriate order shall follow.cc: Counsel (CDF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hadden v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vernon Hadden
Represented By: Lucius P. Hawes, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?