Borden v. United States District Court
Plaintiff: Jason Dean Borden
Defendant: United States District Court
Case Number: 1:2008cv00132
Filed: September 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Warren
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 9/9/2009. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to clarify the named defendant 18 is DENIED. For the foregoing reasons, the Court will, by separate Order, dismiss Plaintiff's claims. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (CDF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Borden v. United States District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Dean Borden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?