Street et al v. U. S. Corrugated, Inc.
| Robert Street, Lisa Murphy, Robert Creek, Kristeen Owens and Brandy Filback |
| U. S. Corrugated, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv00153 |
| October 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Warren |
| E. Robert Goebel |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 7/20/2011 re 59 Bill of Costs and 60 Objection. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the requested bill of costs is approved with the exception of the following: (1 ) $218.11 for the cost of obtaining medical records; (2) $1,406.25 for costs associated with file conversion; and (3) $1,054.15 for the cost of performing criminal background checks. Defendant is awarded costs of $4,903.70. cc: Counsel, pro se Defendants, USCA (CDF) Modified distribution on 7/20/2011 (CDF).
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 4/15/2011 re 52 55 Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion by Plaintiffs to alter, amend, or vacate 52 55 the Court's January 25, 2011, Memorandum Opinion and Order 50 granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment 25 is DENIED. cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 2/11/2011; re 50 Memorandum Opinion and ORDER. Due to clerical error, the third to last sentence in the full paragraph beginning on page 4 reads " Greathouse's actions were certainly inappropriate, but this does establish....". IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sentence is amended to read "Greathouse 's actions were certainly inappropriate, but this does not establish...."cc:counsel (PHB)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 1/25/2011 granting 25 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
