SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag et al v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC et al
| SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag and SCA Personal Care, Inc. |
| First Quality Baby Products, LLC, First Quality Hygienic, Inc., First Quality Retail Services, LLC and First Quality Products, Inc. |
| 1:2010cv00122 |
| August 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Warren |
| E. Robert Goebel |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/7/2017. First Quality's Motion to Exclude Portions of the Expert Report of Earle Sherrod Relating to Infringement and for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (DN 96 ) is DENIED. Firs t Quality's Motion to Exclude Portions of Expert Reports of Earle Sherrod & Richard Gering Relating to Commercial Success (DN 97 ) is DENIED IN PART and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART. SCA's Motion to Preclude Expert Testimony of Daniel D. Ga rdner, Jr. on the Issue of Infringement of the Patent-in-Suit (DN 100 ) is DENIED. However, the parties shall confer within 14 days and attempt to resolve Gardner's failure to answer the disputed questions, after which point the Court will s chedule a telephonic conference with the parties. (See Order for specifics.) First Quality's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (DN 98 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Summary judgment of non-infringement is GRANTED as to SCA-AP-020, SCA-AP-050, SCA-AP-056, SCA-AP-016, SCA-AP-051, SCA-AP-001, and SCA-AP-004 and DENIED as to SCA-AP-010. cc: Counsel (CDR)
|
|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 11/5/2013 re 123 Bill of Costs and 131 revised Bill of Costs; For the reasons set forth, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that costs are awarded in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs in the amount of $88,337.49. Plaintiffs' motion to stay enforcement of an award of costs pending the appeal and waive the requirement of posting bond is GRANTED. cc: Counsel (CDR)
|
|
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 7/15/2013 re 82 83 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 84 MOTION for Hearing. For the reason set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion by Defendants for s ummary judgment based on the doctrines of laches and equitable estoppel (DN 82 , DN 83 ) is GRANTED and the motion by First Quality for a hearing on this motion for summary judgment (DN 84 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining motions are DENIED AS MOOT. A Judgment shall be entered consistent with the Opinion. cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
|
Filing
61
CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 2/9/2012. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court has determined that the disputed claims are to be construed pursuant to this Claims Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order. cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
