Reynolds v. LNU et al
| Robert A Reynolds |
| Elizabeth LNU, Joanna LNU, Jackie Strode, Gayle LNU and William Ethridge |
| 1:2011cv00142 |
| September 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Warren |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 166 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 170 Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's sur-reply. Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 3/10/2016. cc: Counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)
|
|
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., granting in part and denying in part 157 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's medical malpractice claim and is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. The motion is denied without prejudice to filing a properly supported motion for summary judgmen t. Within 30 days of entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendants must file a properly supported motion for summary judgment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff must file a response within 21 days from service of Defendants� 39; motion. Plaintiff must file a new response addressing Defendants' arguments raised in their new motion. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of 136 his earlier response along with the exhibits attached thereto for his reference. Defendants may file a reply within 14 days of service of Plaintiff's response. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel (JLS)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 4/20/12: The official-capacity and individual-capacity claims against Defendants Jackie Strode, Gayle, and William Etheridge and the official-capacity claims against Defendants Joanna an d Elizabeth are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following claims will proceed: (1) the claims of deliberate indifference to a serious med ical need against Defendants Joanna and Elizabeth in their individual capacities; (2) the retaliation claim against Defendant Joanna in her individual capacity; and (3) the medical-malpractice claim against Defendants Joanna and Elizabeth. The Court will enter a separate Scheduling Order governing the development of the continuing claims. cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Defendants, Warren County Attorney, USA (JBM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
