Ridgeway v. Laurel County Jailer
Plaintiff: Thomas Ridgeway
Defendant: Laurel County Jailer
Case Number: 1:2012cv00034
Filed: March 12, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Bowling Green Office
County: Warren
Presiding Judge: Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 4/12/2012; Plaintiff's criminal complaint will be dismissed by separate order. Clerk of Court DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a 1983 packet containing the forms necessary to file a 1983 action should he choose to do so. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendant (CDF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ridgeway v. Laurel County Jailer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Ridgeway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laurel County Jailer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?