SAAP Energy, Inc. et al v. Bell et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 19, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge David J. Hale on 2/18/2015 granting 201 Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Greenwich Insurance Co. No genuine dispute of material fact exists with respect to Greenwich 9;s duty to defend Rebell Oil. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order of August 22, 2013 (Docket No. 125 ) is VACATED. (2) Greenwich Insurance Company's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 201 ) is GRANTED. cc: Counsel, Rao Uppalapti (CDR)
|August 28, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/28/2013 granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Danny Basil. The unjust enrichment claim alleged against Basil in Count VI is DISMISSED. The RICO, RICO conspiracy, and civil conspiracy claims remain. cc: Counsel, Chris Jeffries, Rao N. Uppalapti, Bluegrass Geophysical LLC, I.A.T., Inc. (CDR) Modified distribution on 8/28/2013 (CDR).
|August 22, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/22/2013. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that Greenwich has a duty to defend the claims against Rebell Oil. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Greenwich Insurance Company's motion for summary judgment (DN 74 ) is DENIED and that Rebell Oil's motion (DN 92 ) is GRANTED. cc: Counsel, Chris Jeffries, Rao N. Uppalapti, Bluegrass Geophysical LLC (CDR)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?