Sun Style International, LLC v. Sunless, Inc.

Plaintiff: Sun Style International, LLC
Defendant: Sunless, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00179
Filed: October 18, 2012
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Bowling Green Office
County: Warren
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 1, 2013 26 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/31/2013. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (DN 14 ) is DENIED. cc: Counsel (TJD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sun Style International, LLC v. Sunless, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sun Style International, LLC
Represented By: Kyle Anne Citrynell
Represented By: Christopher A. Bates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunless, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.