Coulter v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Penny K. Coulter |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2013cv00011 |
| January 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Allen |
| Lanny King |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 9/29/2014. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(b), the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's counsel's motion and amended motion (DN 19 and 20 ) and AWARDS attorney fees in the amount of $5,176.50. Counsel shall REIMBURSE Plaintiff the $2,137.50 that this Court previously awarded Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. cc: Counsel(CDR)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 8/18/2014; the United States Attorney shall respond to the fee petition within 30 days from the entry of this Order including a statement of accrued benefits and its position on whether the requested fee is reasonable. cc:counsel (DAK)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 12/11/2013 granting 16 Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $2,137.50 and costs in the amount of $24.00. Plaintiff's motion for leave to re-docket (DN 16 ) is DEN IED. Plaintiff's request that the Court conditionally direct the payment of fees to her counsel, Mary G. Burchett-Bower, is DENIED. To the extent this fee is duplicative of the fee awarded Plaintiff's counsel under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b ), counsel will reimburse the Plaintiff. In the event the proceedings on remand result in the award and payment of benefits to the Plaintiff, the Court will then consider a motion to re-docket the case for consideration of a fee for services under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Final and appealable Order. cc: Counsel (CDR)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 8/1/2013. For the foregoing reasons, this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for a new decision and further administrative proceedings regarding the current availability of jobs in the national economy that Plaintiff can still perform despite her impairments and for reconsideration Plaintiffs ability to reach overhead and use of her left upper extremity in light of the treating source medical opinions. cc: Counsel (TJD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coulter v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Penny K. Coulter | |
| Represented By: | Mary G. Burchett-Bower |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Brady Miller |
| Represented By: | Regina S. Edwards |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
