Bruss North America, Inc. v. Robertson

Plaintiff: Bruss North America, Inc.
Defendant: Kyle Robertson
Case Number: 1:2013cv00021
Filed: February 20, 2013
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Bowling Green Office
County: Russell
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. Russell
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 25, 2015 49 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bruss North America, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 46 is GRANTED. cc: Counsel(JWM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bruss North America, Inc. v. Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruss North America, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel L. Morgan
Represented By: Jon A. Woodall
Represented By: Brendan R. Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kyle Robertson
Represented By: David M. Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?