Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company v. STMCA LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Kentucky Western District Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company v. STMCA LLC

Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company v. STMCA LLC

Plaintiff:	Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:	STMCA LLC
Case Number:	1:2013cv00030
Filed:	March 22, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office:	Bowling Green Office
County:	Warren
Presiding Judge:	H. Brent Brennenstuhl
Presiding Judge:	Joseph H. McKinley
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 23, 2013	Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 10/23/2013. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion by Defendant, STMCA LLC, to set aside entry of default DN 28 and the amended motion by Defendant to set aside entry of de fault DN 32 are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion by Defendant for leave to file an answer and counterclaim out of time DN 34 is GRANTED. The Clerk shall file the tendered Answer and Counterclaim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion by Plaintiff, Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company, for default judgment [DN 30] is DENIED. cc: Counsel (TJD)
August 13, 2013	Filing 16 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 8/13/2013 adopting 11 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pleading, including answer and counterclaim, filed by Defendant Michael Barrick (DN 8) is STRICKEN from the docket. cc: Counsel, Michael Barrick (TJD)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 23, 2013

Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 10/23/2013. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion by Defendant, STMCA LLC, to set aside entry of default DN 28 and the amended motion by Defendant to set aside entry of de fault DN 32 are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion by Defendant for leave to file an answer and counterclaim out of time DN 34 is GRANTED. The Clerk shall file the tendered Answer and Counterclaim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion by Plaintiff, Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company, for default judgment [DN 30] is DENIED. cc: Counsel (TJD)

August 13, 2013

Filing 16 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 8/13/2013 adopting 11 Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pleading, including answer and counterclaim, filed by Defendant Michael Barrick (DN 8) is STRICKEN from the docket. cc: Counsel, Michael Barrick (TJD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company v. STMCA LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company
Represented By:	Hans M. Pfaffenberger
Represented By:	Perry Adanick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: STMCA LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?