Stewart v. City of Franklin et al
| Michael V. Stewart |
| Barren River Area Development District, Franklin Police Department, City of Franklin, Kevin Allen and Kenton Powell |
| 1:2013cv00070 |
| May 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Simpson |
| H. Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 4/24/2014 re 34 Motion to Set Aside or Amend Judgment. For the reasons set forth, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Michael Stewart's Rule 59(e) Motion to Set Aside or Amend Judgment (DN 34 ) is GRANTED. The judgment entered on December 2, 2013 (DN 33 ) is VACATED consistent with this opinion. cc: Counsel (CDR)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 11/27/2013. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants City of Franklin, Franklin Police Department, and Kenton Powell's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (DN 18 ). Also, Defendan t Barren River Area Development District's Motion to Dismiss (DN 19 ) and Defendant Kevin Allen's Motion to Dismiss (DN 20 ) are GRANTED. All of Plaintiff's claims, both federal and state, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. cc: Counsel (CDR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
