Smith v. Strode et al
| Jermaine M. Smith |
| Jackie Strode and Patt Watt |
| 1:2014cv00037 |
| March 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph H. McKinley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers granting 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jackie Strode, Patt Watt; denying Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment (DN 41). A separate Judgment will be entered dismissing this case. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; counsel of record (SG)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr granting 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint, granting in part and denying in part 10 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint and conducting initial screening pursuant to 1915A. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs claim relating to the destruction of his mail is DISMISSED. The Court will enter a separate Scheduling Order to govern the development of Plaintiffs continuing claims against Defendants Strode and Watt in their individual and officialcapacities relating to the policy of taking money out of his account without due process based on suspicion of a scam.cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Warren County Atty (SG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
