Arterburn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
| Jamie Arterburn |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Sam's East, Inc., Heather Harrison, Mike Miller, Matt Coffey, William Taylor, David Hall and David Martin |
| 1:2015cv00109 |
| September 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Warren |
| Greg N. Stivers |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 2/2/2017 granting 38 Motion to Reconsider. The Court's previous order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (DN 31 ) is VAC ATED. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider (DN 50 ) and Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (DN 37 , 47 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. Because complete diversity is lacking, this case is REMANDED to the Warren Circuit Court, and it shall be STRICKEN from the Court's active docket. cc: Counsel; Warren Circuit Court Clerk (Civil Action No. 15-CI-939)(CDR)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers. The Motion to Dismiss Counts 3 through 12 filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Sam's East, Inc. (DN 12 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (DN 21 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (DN 7 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. cc: Counsel; Defendants (CDR) Modified distribution on 7/7/2016 (CDR).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
