Covington v. LORD Corporation
Plaintiff: Annisa F. Covington
Defendant: LORD Corporation
Case Number: 1:2016cv00093
Filed: June 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Bowling Green Office
County: Warren
Presiding Judge: Greg N. Stivers
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 er Removal- Employment Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 5/26/2017. The Magistrate Judge's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation (DN 30 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement (DN 22 ) is DENIED. cc: Counsel; Annisa Covington, pro se(JWM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Covington v. LORD Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annisa F. Covington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LORD Corporation
Represented By: Wendy V. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?