Bolden v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
Amy Bolden |
Aetna Life Insurance Company |
1:2016cv00118 |
July 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Bowling Green Office |
Simpson |
Greg N. Stivers |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 1/10/2017 granting 12 Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss. cc: Counsel (CDR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bolden v. Aetna Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Amy Bolden | |
Represented By: | Andrew M. Grabhorn |
Represented By: | Michael D. Grabhorn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Tina M. Bengs |
Represented By: | Kevin E. Roberts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.