Thomas v. Kentuckys' State Guardian System
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Thomas, Jr.
Defendant: Kentuckys' State Guardian System
Case Number: 1:2017cv00093
Filed: May 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Bowling Green Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Greg N. Stivers
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 10/17/2017. For reasons stated within this Memorandum Opinion, this action will be dismissed by separate order.cc:Plaintiff; Defendant; General Counsel, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet (JWM) Modified to add distribution on 10/17/2017 (JWM).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Kentuckys' State Guardian System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Thomas, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kentuckys' State Guardian System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?