Maysey v. Henkel Corporation et al
| Nathaniel Edward Maysey |
| Henkel Corporation, Henkel AG & Co. KGAA and Nemak USA Inc. |
| 1:2017cv00108 |
| June 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Barren |
| Greg N. Stivers |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
200
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 10/17/2022 denying 194 Motion to Alter Judgment. This matter is stayed pending appeal. cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
|
Filing
191
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 3/31/2022. Henkel's Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 173 ) is granted. Maysey's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment against Henkel Corporation (DN 170 ) is denied. Nemak 9;s Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 172 ) is denied. Maysey's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Nemak's Michael Taubitz (DN 169 ) is granted. Nemak's Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Dr. Thomas R. Huston (DN 171 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Maysey's Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Henkel's Scott Dunlap (DN 168 ) is denied as moot. cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
|
Filing
149
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 12/16/2019 denying 134 Defendant Nemak USA Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment. cc: Counsel (CDF)
|
|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 4/10/2018 granting 83 Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint. The Clerk of court is directed to file the tendered third-party complaint and issue the summons. cc: Counsel(JM)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 1/5/2018. The motion of Defendant Henkel (DN 60 ) is GRANTED and Rivendell Behavioral Health is ORDERED TO PRODUCE the documents identified in the subpoena served upon it. Plaintiff Maysey's motion to quash and for entry of a protective order (DN 66 ) is DENIED. cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
