Blume v. Small Business Administrator (SBA)

Plaintiff: Guy Blume
Defendant: Small Business Administration
Case Number: 1:2017cv00156
Filed: September 11, 2017
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Office: Bowling Green Office
County: Todd
Presiding Judge: Greg N. Stivers
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 15:631
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 29, 2018 23 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 5/25/2018. For the reasons outlined, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (DN 16 ) is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (DN 4 , 13 ) are DENIED AS MOOT, and the Amended Complaint (DN 10 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. cc: Counsel; Guy Blume, pro se (CDF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blume v. Small Business Administrator (SBA)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Guy Blume
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Small Business Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?