Lowery v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice et al
Esteban DeJesus Lowery |
Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice, Bowling Green Police Department, John D. Brown, Benjamin Carroll, Matt Cardwell, David Lanphear and N. Boyar |
1:2018cv00059 |
May 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Bowling Green Office |
Warren |
Joseph H. McKinley |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 11/8/2018. The following claims are STAYED pending completion of the state criminal proceedings: the claims of excessive force, denial of equal protection, false statements in warrants, and destruction of evidence under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments against Defendants Officers Carroll and Boyer and Trooper Cardwell in their individual capacities for damages. Within 30 days of entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Ord er, Plaintiff must provide the Court with information in writing regarding his pending state-court criminal actions. (See Order for requested information.) All other claims are DISMISSED and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate the Commonwea lth of Kentucky Court of Justice, the Bowling Green Police Department, and Judges Brown and Lanphear. Plaintiff is WARNED that his failure to comply with this Order within 30 days will result in dismissal of this action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants (CDF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.