Hill v. Tammy et al
| Harold Hill |
| Jailor Doug Thomas, Captain Tom Jones, Captain Johnson and Nurse Tammy |
| 1:2018cv00103 |
| August 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Bowling Green Office |
| Adair |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 8/9/2018 TRANSFERRING the instant action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington for all further proceedings. All other filings shall be with that court.cc:Plaintiff, pro se; Clerk KYED (JWM)
|
| Remark: Case transferred from Kentucky Western has been opened in Eastern District of Kentucky as case 5:18-cv-00488, filed 08/09/2018. (MLG) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Harold Hill by Harold Hill. (JWM) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Harold Hill, pro se (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nurse Tammy, Captain Johnson, Tom Jones, and Doug Thomas filed by Harold Hill, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Envelope) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
