Graham v. Plastics Engineering Company et al
David H. Graham |
General Electric Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Plastics Engineering Company and Union Carbide Corporation |
1:2018cv00134 |
September 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Greg N Stivers |
P.I. : Asbestos |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE to Take Deposition of Plaintiff, David Graham by David H. Graham. (Kelley, Paul) |
Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Occidental Chemical Holding Corporation, Occidental Petroleum Investment Co., Occidental Petroleum Corporation as Corporate Parents by Occidental Chemical Corporation. (Schupbach, Rebecca) Modified to add corporate parents on 10/29/2018 (JWM). |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Occidental Chemical Corporation. (Schupbach, Rebecca) |
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Soco West, Inc., Corporate Parent Brilliant National Services, Inc. for Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc.. by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc.. (Watt, Whitney) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc.. (Watt, Whitney) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plastics Engineering Company. (Bentley, Frederick) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Plastics Engineering Company. (Bentley, Frederick) |
Filing 10 SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE as to Plastics Engineering Company COMPLETED on 9/26/2018. Secretary of State return states We are enclosing the return receipt confirming receipt of summons.. (DAK) |
Filing 9 SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE as to Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc. COMPLETED on 9/26/2018. Secretary of State return states We are enclosing the return receipt confirming receipt of summons.. (DAK) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by General Electric Company. (Gowen, Gregory) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by General Electric Company. (Gowen, Gregory) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent The Dow Chemical Company and DowDuPont Inc. for Union Carbide Corporation. by Union Carbide Corporation. (Rowlen, Brantley) Modified to add corporate parent on 10/5/2018 (CDF). |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Union Carbide Corporation. (Rowlen, Brantley) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brantley C. Rowlen, R. Scott Masterson, V. Ashley Waller on behalf of Union Carbide Corporation (Rowlen, Brantley) Modified to add additional attorneys on 10/3/2018 (CDF). |
Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., General Electric Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Plastics Engineering Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc.. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (JWM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Plastics Engineering Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Union Carbide Corporation, and General Electric Company, filed by David H. Graham. Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 0644-2721382. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (JWM) |
Remark-Attested copy of complaint emailed to Attorney Paul Kelley 9/21/2018 per request. (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.