Upchurch v. Clinton County Board of Education et al
| Adam Upchurch |
| Angela Sloan, Clinton County Board of Education, Stacey Evans and Charlotte Nasief |
| 1:2018cv00150 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
AGREED ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 12/6/2018 re #4 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation. Defendants answer due date is extended to 12/21/2018.cc:counsel (JWM)
|
| Filing 4 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation by Clinton County Board of Education, Stacey Evans, Charlotte Nasief, Angela Sloan. (Chenoweth, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to Clinton County Board of Education, Stacey Evans, Charlotte Nasief, Angela Sloan. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Clinton County Board of Education, Charlotte Nasief, Stacey Evans, and Angela Sloan, filed by Adam Upchurch. Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 0644-2735784. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
