Trulock v. Horse Cave City et al
| Chris Trulock |
| Horse Cave City and Randall Curry |
| 1:2019cv00063 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris Trulock. Horse Cave City served on 7/9/2019, answer due 7/30/2019. (Schneider, Louis) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chris Trulock. Randall Curry served on 7/9/2019, answer due 7/30/2019. (Schneider, Louis) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued as to Randall Curry, Horse Cave City. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (CDF) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Corrected Summons by Chris Trulock re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Schneider, Louis) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 Complaint. Incomplete summons forms tendered with Complaint. See Notice for filing instructions. cc: Counsel (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Horse Cave City and Randall Curry, filed by Chris Trulock. Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 0644-2869953. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
