Malone v. Department of the Treasury et al
| Dean Edward Malone |
| Jennifer Perez, Internal Revenue Service, Christine L. Davis, Danny Kincaid, Department of the Treasury and Carl W. Dorn, II |
| 1:2019cv00170 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Pro Se (Non Prisoner) Registration to Receive Documents Electronically cc:QC Clerk (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR REFUND OF TAXES against Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Christine L. Davis, Carl W. Dorn, II, Danny Kincaid, and Jennifer Perez, filed by Dean Edward Malone, pro se. Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number L33062162. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Tax Returns, #2 Exhibit B-IRS Refund-Related Correspondence, #3 Exhibit C-Alleged Frivolous Returns Correspondence, #4 Exhibit D-Freedom of Information Act Disclosures and Failed Discoveries Attempts, #5 Notices of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons) (JWM) Modified on 11/22/2019 (CDF). (Attachment 4 replaced on 11/22/2019) (CDF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
