Tarter Gate Company, LLC v. Tarter CBD, LLC et al
| Tarter Gate Company, LLC |
| Tarter Proud, LLC, Tarter CBD, LLC and Joshua Donald Tarter |
| 1:2020cv00114 |
| July 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 7/31/2020; Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 9/10/2020 at 9:30 AM CT before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. Counsel who will try the case shall participate in the conference. Parties shall conduct meeting required by Rule 26(f) by 8/20/2020 and file their Rule 26 Meeting Report by 9/3/2020. (Review Order in full for specifics, including report and attendance requirements.) cc: Counsel; KL (CDF)
|
|
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 7/30/2020; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Brennenstuhl is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record; KLL (TJD)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Joshua Donald Tarter, Tarter CBD, LLC, Tarter Proud, LLC. (Merrick, Michael) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tarter Gate Company, LLC. Tarter Proud, LLC served on 7/21/2020, answer due 8/11/2020. (VanVactor, Zachary) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Tarter Gate Company, LLC. Amendment to #5 Summons Returned Executed by Tarter Gate Company, LLC. (VanVactor, Zachary) |
| Filing 9 Summons Reissued as to Tarter Proud, LLC. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons. (CDF) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tarter Gate Company, LLC. (VanVactor, Zachary) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing of Amended Summons for Issuance to Defendant Tarter Proud, LLC by Tarter Gate Company, LLC (Attachments: #1 Summons (Amended) to Defendant Tarter Proud, LLC) (VanVactor, Zachary) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tarter Gate Company, LLC. Tarter CBD, LLC served on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. (VanVactor, Zachary) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tarter Gate Company, LLC. Joshua Donald Tarter served on 7/9/2020, answer due 7/30/2020. (VanVactor, Zachary) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing or Determination re:Patent or Trademark re #1 Complaint, (JWM) |
| Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to Joshua Donald Tarter, Tarter CBD, LLC, Tarter Proud, LLC. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tarter CBD, LLC, Tarter Proud, LLC, and Joshua Donald Tarter, filed by Tarter Gate Company, LLC. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0644-3133813. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Joshua Donald Tarter, #3 Summons Tarter CBD, #4 Summons Tarter Proud) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
