Otterson v. Bates et al
| Derek Matthew Otterson |
| Samantha Costello, Charles Bates and Billy Begley |
| 1:2020cv00137 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Response to #5 Notice of Deficiency filed by Derek Matthew Otterson. (Attachments: #1 signed signature page to DN #4 & envelope) (CDF) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Deficiency re #4 Supplement. Reason for Deficiency: Filing is not signed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 10/21/2020. (CDF) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint, by Derek Matthew Otterson. (CDF) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2020: #1 signed signature page (with envelope) received 9/28/2020) (CDF). |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Expedite Ruling by Plaintiff Derek Matthew Otterson (CDF) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (CDF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Bates, Samantha Costello, Billy Begley, filed by Derek Matthew Otterson. (Filing fee $400, receipt number B33002135.) (Attachments: #1 Complaint continuation, #2 Statement of Claims, #3 cover letter, #4 miscellaneous attachment, #5 exhibits, #6 Detailed Release Reports, #7 tendered Summonses, #8 miscellaneous, #9 envelope) (CDF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
