Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Gaddco, Inc. et al
| Cincinnati Insurance Company |
| Gaddco, Inc., Allen Gaddis, United States of America Internal Revenue Service, German-American Bank and Tonia Gaddis |
| 1:2020cv00168 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee received: $ 400, receipt number L33064955. (SRH) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Interpleader Deposit (28 U.S.C. Section 1335), by Plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (SRH) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Cincinnati Financial Corporation for Cincinnati Insurance Company. (SRH) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (SRH) |
| Filing 1 INTERPLEADER COMPLAINT, filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company, against Gaddco, Inc., Allen Gaddis, Tonia Gaddis, German-American Bank, and United States of America Internal Revenue Service. Filing fee $400, receipt number L33064955. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Cover Sheet, #10 Addendum to Civil Cover Sheet) (SRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
