Logsdon v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Daphne Logsdon
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2020cv00177
Filed: October 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: H Brent Brennenstuhl
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daphne Logsdon as to:Commissioner of Social Security (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Executed Affidavit of Mailing) (Palmer, Melissa)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security. United States Attorney served on 10/29/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. (CDF)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 11/6/2020. (CDF)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Summonses Issued and forwarded to the USMS as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM-285 (USA), #2 USM-285 (SSA), #3 USM-285 (USAG)) (CDF)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 10/15/2020 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. cc: Counsel (CDF)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 10/15/2020 granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Melissa A. Palmer. cc: Counsel(CDF)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Melissa A. Palmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3205104. by Plaintiff Daphne Logsdon (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Palmer, Melissa)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Proposed Order by Daphne Logsdon re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Palmer, Melissa) Modified to add text on 10/15/2020 (CDF).
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Daphne Logsdon (JWM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/15/2020: #1 Proposed Order) (CDF).
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. (JWM)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Daphne Logsdon. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Letter to Clerk, #3 Exhibit A-Notice of Appeals Council Action, #4 Summons) (JWM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Logsdon v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Timothy D. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daphne Logsdon
Represented By: Melissa A. Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?