Synergy Plumbing, LLC v. Bain et al
Synergy Plumbing, LLC |
Goldberg Simpson, LLC, Todd Brand, Howard Bain, Emalfarb, Swan & Bain and Stephen E. Smith |
1:2020cv00188 |
November 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Greg N Stivers |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ATTACHMENT(s) re #4 Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Constr. Sys v. Fagel Harber, LLC, #2 Exhibit Bradson Mercantile, Inc. v. Crabtree, #3 Exhibit McKenzie v. Berggren, #4 Exhibit Pippen v. Pederson) by Howard Bain, Todd Brand, Emalfarb, Swan & Bain. (Jones, Brian) |
Filing 4 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Howard Bain, Todd Brand, Emalfarb, Swan & Bain (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Jones, Brian) |
Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to Howard Bain, Todd Brand, Emalfarb, Swan & Bain, Goldberg Simpson, LLC, Stephen E. Smith. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (JWM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Howard Bain, Todd Brand, Emalfarb, Swan & Bain, Stephen E. Smith, Goldberg Simpson, LLC, filed by Synergy Plumbing, LLC. Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 0644-3222712 (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Summons) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.