Luster v. Luster
Joseph William Luster |
Sharon Bigay Luster |
1:2020cv00211 |
December 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Greg N Stivers |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Joseph William Luster. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Memorandum Concerning Jurisdiction, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Order, #3 Exhibit 3 - Motion for Hearing, #4 Proposed Order) (Lewis, Benjamin) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Sharon Bigay Luster (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1- Employment Agreement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2- 16-CI-00755 Courtnet History, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3- Court of Appeals Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4- Appellant Brief, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5- Delaware Complaint, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 6- 18-CI-00357 Courtnet History, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 7- Termination Letter, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 8- Marital Settlement Agreement, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 9- Decree, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 10- Pleadings & Orders, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 11- Attorney Fee Demand Letter, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 12- Motion for Hearing Regarding Attorney's Fees, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 13A- Trust Complaint, #15 Exhibit Exhibit 13B- Trust Complaint, #16 Exhibit Exhibit 13C- Trust Complaint) (Hixson, Casey) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph William Luster. Sharon Bigay Luster served on 12/30/2020, answer due 1/20/2021. (Lewis, Benjamin) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Sharon Bigay Luster. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (JWM) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #3 Notice of Deficiency by Joseph William Luster. (Lewis, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint.Reason for Deficiency: Summonses Required for Each Defendant. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 12/28/2020. (JWM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sharon Bigay Luster, filed by Joseph William Luster. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0644-3249289. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-Consulting Agreement, #3 Exhibit 2-Marital Settlement Agreement, #4 Exhibit 3-Correspondence) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Luster v. Luster | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joseph William Luster | |
Represented By: | Amanda Dohn Reed |
Represented By: | Benjamin Joel Lewis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sharon Bigay Luster | |
Represented By: | Casey Alan Hixson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.