Hays v. Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc. et al
Tracey Hays |
Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc., Trion Solutions, Inc. and Stacey Robinson |
1:2021cv00034 |
March 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Greg N Stivers |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL by Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc., Trion Solutions, Inc. (Birchfield, Thomas) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc., Trion Solutions, Inc.. (Goatley, Paul) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Trion Solutions, Inc.. (Goatley, Paul) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc.. (Goatley, Paul) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL re #1 Notice of Removal from Barren Circuit Court, Civil Action Number 21-CI-50. cc: Counsel; Barren Circuit Court (JWM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Trion Solutions, Inc., Driveline Retail Merchandising, Inc. from Barren Circuit Court, Case number 21-CI-00050. ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number 0644-3295308 ) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Action, #2 Cover Sheet) (JWM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.