DeCuir v. CRM Development Company et al
| Brett DeCuir |
| CRM Development Company doing business as CRM Companies and Dropping Bird 16, L.L.C. |
| 1:2021cv00040 |
| March 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
AGREED ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 5/6/2021 granting #22 Proposed Agreed Order. Plaintiff shall file response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dn #19 ) by 5/28/2021. cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
| Filing 22 Proposed Agreed Order by Brett DeCuir. (Alexander, William) |
| Filing 21 Proposed Order of Dismissal and Referral to Arbitration re #19 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by CRM Development Company, Dropping Bird 16, L.L.C.. (Marino, Kara) |
| Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CRM Development Company, Dropping Bird 16, L.L.C.. (Marino, Kara) |
| Filing 19 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants CRM Development Company, Dropping Bird 16, L.L.C. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Garyen Denning, Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 1-A ICIMS login, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 1-B ICIMS Welcome Email, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 1-C Handbook Acknowledgement, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 1-D Employee Handbook and Policy Manual, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 1-E Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 1-F Dropping Bird Security Update - Manager, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 1-G Shift Manager Schedules, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 1-H Time Punches, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 1-I Payroll Records, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 1-J Time Punches - Training, #13 Affidavit Affidavit of James Beaucham, Exhibit 2) (Marino, Kara) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/19/2021: #14 Proposed Order) (JWM). |
| Filing 18 SUPPLEMENT re #16 Summons Returned Executed by Brett DeCuir. (Alexander, William) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brett DeCuir. CRM Development Company served on 3/15/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Alexander, William) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brett DeCuir. Dropping Bird 16, L.L.C. served on 3/19/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Alexander, William) |
|
Filing 15
AGREED ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/6/2021 granting #14 Proposed Agreed Order. Defendants are granted leave of Court to file their responsive pleading through 4/16/2021. cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
| Filing 14 Proposed Agreed Order extending time to file responsive pleading by CRM Development Company, Dropping Bird 16, L.L.C.. (Marino, Kara) |
|
Filing 13
AGREED ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/5/2021 granting #9 Proposed Agreed Order. Defendants are granted leave of the Court to file their responsive pleading through 4/9/2021. cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/5/2021 granting #8 Motion for William Clifton "Clif" Alexander to Appear Pro Hac Vice cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/5/2021 granting #7 Motion for Carter T. Hastings to Appear Pro Hac Vice cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/5/2021 granting #6 Motion for Austin W. Anderson to Appear Pro Hac Vice cc: Counsel(JWM)
|
| Filing 9 Proposed Agreed Order Granting Leave to File Responsive Pleading through April 9, 2021 by CRM Development Company, Dropping Bird 16, L.L.C.. (Marino, Kara) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for William Clifton Alexander to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3316482. by Plaintiff Brett DeCuir (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Gilday, Anne) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Carter T. Hastings to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3316456. by Plaintiff Brett DeCuir (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit) (Gilday, Anne) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Austin W. Anderson to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3316412. by Plaintiff Brett DeCuir (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Gilday, Anne) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 3/15/2021 granting #4 Motion to Strike and Substitute. Exhibit 1 of Plaintiff's Original Collective and Class Action Complaint (DN No. #1 -1) shall be stricken from the record and that Exhibit 1 of the Motion (ECF No. #4 -1) shall substitute and replace Exhibit 1 of the Plaintiff's Original Collective and Class Action Complaint. cc: Counsel; Clif Alexander (JWM) Modified to edit distribution on 3/15/2021 (JWM).
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Strike and Substitute #1 Complaint,. Document or Part to be Stricken and/or Substituted: Exhibit 1 by Plaintiff Brett DeCuir (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Brett DeCuir Consent to Join, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Carter T. Hastings, #3 Proposed Order) (Alexander, William) |
| Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to CRM Development Company, Dropping Bird 16, L.L.C.. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (JWM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM) |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against CRM Development Company, Dropping Bird 16, L.L.C., filed by Brett DeCuir. Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number 0644-3302155. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Written Consent of Brett DeCuir, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (JWM) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/15/2021) (JWM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
