Acrey v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Scott Acrey
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2021cv00055
Filed: April 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: H Brent Brennenstuhl
Referring Judge: Greg N Stivers
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 eb
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2021 Filing 14 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (von Schleicher, Warren)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 6/2/2021; If the parties would like a telephonic scheduling conference, the request shall be made to the Magistrate Judge's Case Manager. Unless the parties request a conference, the Court will prepare a scheduling order based upon the parties' report. Parties shall conduct meeting required by Rule 26(f) by 6/16/2021 and file their Rule 26 Meeting Report by 6/30/2021. (Review Order in full for specifics.) cc: Counsel; KL (CDF)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 6/2/2021; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Brennenstuhl is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record; KLL (TJD)
June 1, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint re #1 , Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (von Schleicher, Warren) Modified to add link to DN #1 on 6/2/2021 (CDF).
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 5/11/2021 granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Hartford shall have until 6/1/2021 to file its responsive pleading. cc: Counsel(JWM)
May 10, 2021 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company's Unopposed Motion for Additional Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (von Schleicher, Warren)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 AGREED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/14/2021 granting #6 Proposed Agreed Order. Defendant's deadline to answer extended to 5/10/2021. cc: Counsel (CDF)
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF WARREN SEBASTIAN VON SCHLEICHER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 4/13/2021 granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice cc: Counsel (CDF)
April 13, 2021 Filing 6 Proposed Agreed Order to Extend Time for Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company to Answer or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (von Schleicher, Warren)
April 12, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Warren Sebastian von Schleicher to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3322754. by Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Warren Sebastian von Schleicher, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit C - Proposed Order) (von Schleicher, Warren)
April 12, 2021 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal from Clinton Circuit Court, Civil Action Number 21-CI-0028. cc: Counsel; Clinton Circuit Court (JWM)
April 12, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Hartford Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. for Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (JWM)
April 12, 2021 Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (JWM)
April 12, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company from Clinton Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-00028. ( Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number 0644-3322522 ) (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-Summons, #3 Exhibit B-Complaint, #4 Exhibit C-Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (JWM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acrey v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Represented By: Warren S. von Schleicher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Acrey
Represented By: Bartley K. Hagerman
Represented By: Philip G. Fairbanks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?