Velic v. Ally Auto et al
| Adem Velic |
| Ally Auto and Universal Warranty Company |
| 1:2021cv00135 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Greg N Stivers |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl for telephonic scheduling conference held 11/4/2021. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosure due by 11/17/2021. Defendants Joinder of Parties due by 12/17/2021. Plaintiff Joinder of Parties due by 11/19/2021. Defendant Amended Pleadings due by 12/17/2021. Plaintiff Amended Pleadings due by 11/19/2021. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 4/22/2022. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 5/27/2022. Fact Discovery due by 4/29/2022. A telephonic status conference will be held 1/10/2022 at 9:30 am CST. The Court will initiate the call. Daubert Motion due by 8/5/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 8/5/2022. Expert Discovery due by 6/17/2022. A telephonic status conference will be held 6/28/2022 at 9:30 am CDT. The Court will initiate the call. cc:counsel (JWM)
|
| Filing 9 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Ally Auto, Universal Warranty Company. (Kenney, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FOR RULE 16 SCHEDULNG CONFERENCE by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 9/23/2021. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl will conduct a telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference on 11/4/2021 at 10:30 am CDT/11:30 am EDT. The Court will initiate the call. Counsel for the parties shall conduct a meeting of the parties by 10/14/2021. Counsel for the parties shall file their written joint report by 10/28/2021. See Order for details. cc:counsel; KL-Case Manager (JWM)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 09/23/2021; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge Brennenstuhl is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record; KLL (TJD)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Ally Auto, Universal Warranty Company. (Kenney, Jonathan) |
| Schedules: Answers due on 10/7/2021 per stipulations at DN 1-1. (TJD) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE to Warren Circuit Court and counsel, re #1 Notice of Removal. (DeW) |
| Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (DeW) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ally Auto. (DeW) Modified to correct filing date on 9/17/2021. (DeW). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Ally Financial, Inc., Corporate Parent Ally Insurance Holdings, Inc. for Universal Warranty Company, by Universal Warranty Company. (DeW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ally Auto, Universal Warranty Company from Warren Circuit Court, Division 2, case number 21-CI-1005. (Receipt number AKYWDC-3430095, Filing fee $ 402). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B- GAP Contract, #3 Exhibit C- Notice of filing Notice of Removal, #4 Cover Sheet) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
