Bachman et al v. Dollar General Corporation et al
| Gale Bachman and Stefan Bachman |
| Dollar General Corporation and Unknown Employees of Dollar General Corporation |
| 1:2022cv00021 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Benjamin Beaton |
| H Brent Brennenstuhl |
| Greg N Stivers |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER by Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl on 4/15/2022. Upon request of counsel for the parties, IT IS ORDERED the Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 4/18/2022 is RESCHEDULED to be conducted on 4/26/2022 at 10:30 AM, CDT, before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. The Court will initiate the call. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (KLL)
|
| Filing 10 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Dollar General Corporation, Unknown Employees of Dollar General Corporation. (Givens, Colton) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT (EBOC) by Judge Beaton on 3/2/2022. Telephonic Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 4/18/2022 at 10:00 AM CDT before Magistrate Judge H. Brent Brennenstuhl. The Court will initiate the call. cc: Counsel (SMJ)
|
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Brennenstuhl for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge Brennenstuhl may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (SMJ) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 3/1/2022. Pursuant to 28 USC 455, the Court concludes that recusal in this case is required. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is reassigned to the docket of Judge Benjamin Beaton for all further proceedings and disposition, pursuant to General Order 2020-27. Counsel are instructed to change the civil action number to reflect the initials (BJB) in place and instead of the initials (GNS) on all further pleadings. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel of Record; Case Manager Judge Beaton
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dollar General Corporation, Unknown Employees of Dollar General Corporation. (Givens, Colton) Modified to correct filer on 3/1/2022 (TJD). |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Dollar General Corporation. (Givens, Colton) Modified to correct filer on 3/1/2022 (TJD). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of filing by Dollar General Corporation, Unknown Employees of Dollar General Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Completed Civil Cover Sheet) (Givens, Colton) Modified to correct filer on 3/1/2022 (TJD). |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE to Clinton Circuit Court and Counsel, re #1 Notice of Removal. (DeW) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers. (DeW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clinton Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-00002, filed by Dollar General Corporation. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AKYWDC-3533340.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Circuit Court Pleadings, #2 Cover Sheet (Incomplete)) (DeW) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/1/2022: #3 Cover Sheet COMPLETED) (DeW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
